Saturday, 24 June 2017    HomeAbout UsContact Us     



You are here: Home / More Topics >> / The Innovators / The Principles of the Haddaadiyyah
Yahyaa al-Hajuri Establishes Himself a Liar By Trying to Cover Up His Accusation that the Companions Participated in the Murder of Uthmaan
Filed under: The Principles of the Haddaadiyyah
Monday, March 18 2013 - by Manhaj.Com
Key topics: Yahya Al-Hajuri Haddaadiyyah Ghulaat Al-Haajooree

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

Here is the audio of al-Hajuri trying to explain the issue. Recall that al-Hajuri explicitly stated in his book the following, "And the participation of some of the Sahaabah in the killing of Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu)..." and in what follows look at how he blatantly tries to say that this means other than what it actually does mean!

In this audio al-Hajuri, following the way of Abu al-Hasan al-Ma'ribee, when he tried to wriggle out of his slander of the Companions, starts to tell his story, saying:

I say: This saying that I say that the Companions participated in the killing of Uthmaan, this occurred becase Ibn Katheer and a group of the people of knowledge mentioned that Muhammad bin Abi Bakr al-Siddeeq (radiallaahu anhu), and specifically this one only, then they mentioned this, and we investigated the issue and found that within (the matter) are (reports) whose chains are not established and we said, it was in the context of the investigation, not that we actually affirm that they participated in the killing of Uthmaan, however in the context of the research, in accordance with what was mentioned by Ibn Katheer in al-Bidaayah wal-Nihaayah and Ibn Sa'd in al-Tabaqaat, then when Shaykh al-Islaam indicated that the chains of narration are not established, we did not say this except upon the (basis of) the apparentness of statements. As for it being said that we speak with this, then never, refuge is from Allaah, the Companions did not participate in the killing of Uthmaan, rather the Khawaarij killed him.

As you will see from further below, al-Hajuri has blatantly lied without any shame, it is as clear as daylight that he has lied. Al-Hajuri's attempts to cover this matter up has been followed up by some of the people of knowledge and students of knowledge, here we will summarize the essential points from what has been written in exposing al-Hajuri the Mubtadi' and Muhdith:

ONE: As for al-Hajuri's claim regarding Ibn Katheer, then Ibn Katheer states about Muhammad bin Abi Bakr's birth and age:

Ibn Katheer said (al-Bidaayah 7/353):

محمد بن أبي بكر الصديق ولد في حياة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم في حجة الوداع تحت الشجرة عند الحرم وأمه أسماء بنت عميس، ولما احتضر الصديق أوصى أن تغسله فغسلته، ثم لما انقضت عدتها تزوجها علي فنشأ في حجره، فلما صارت إليه الخلافة استنابه على بلاد مصر بعد قيس بن سعد بن عبادة كما قدمنا، فلما كانت هذه السنة بعث معاوية عمرو بن العاص فاستلب منه بلاد مصر وقتل محمد بن أبي بكر كما تقدم، وله من العمر دون الثلاثين، رحمه الله ورضي عنه

And in al-Baa'ith al-Hatheeth (p. 187), Ibn Katheer said:

ولقد عدّوا فيهم محمد بن أبي بكر الصديق وإنما وُلِد عند الشجرة وقت الإحرام بحجة الوداع فلم يدرك من حياته صلى الله عليه وسلم إلا نحواً من مائة يوم ولم يذكروا أنه أُحْضِر عند النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ولا رآه

In the above two passages, Ibn Katheer establishes that Muhammad bin Abi Bakr was born during the farewell pilgrimage and that he was present for a hundred days prior to the passing away of the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and that it is not mentioned by (the historians, muhadditheen) that he was brought before or actually met the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam).

TWO: The second issue is that Ibn Katheer himself after mentioning what some of the historians mentioned that Muhammad bin Abi Bakr participated in the killing of Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu) he actually exonerates Muhammad bin Abi Bakr from this claim. He said in al-Bidaayah (7/185):

ويُروى أن محمد بن أبي بكر طعنه بمشاقص في أذنه حتى دخلت في حلقه والصحيح أن الذي فعل ذلك غيره وأنه استحى ورجع حين قال له عثمان لقد أخذت بلحية كان أبوك يكرمها فتذمم من ذاك وغطى وجهه ورجع وحاجز دونه فلم يفد وكان أمر الله قدراً مقدورا

In the above passage, Ibn Katheer says, that

It is reported that Muhammad bin Abi Bakr stabbed him with a spear in his ear which penetrated his throat. And what is correct is that the one who did this was other than him (Muhammad) and that he became embarassed and returned when Uthmaan said to him, "You have taken hold of a beard which your father used to honour," so he would blame himself regarding that...

And in fact a page earlier (7/184), Ibn Katheer said:

قال سيف بن عمر التميمي رحمه الله: عن العيص بن القاسم، عن رجل، عن خنساء مولاة أسامة بن زيد - وكانت تكون مع نائلة بنت الفرافصة امرأة عثمان -: أنها كانت في الدار، ودخل محمد بن أبي بكر وأخذ بلحيته وأهوى بمشاقص معه فيجأ بها في حلقه .فقال: مهلا يا ابن أخي، فوالله لقد أخذت مأخذا ما كان أبوك ليأخذ به، فتركه وانصرف مستحييا نادما، فاستقبله القوم على باب الصفة فردهم طويلا حتى غلبوه فدخلوا، وخرج محمد راجعا.

In which there occurs:

Sayf bin Umar al-Tameemi (rahimahullaah) said: From al-Ayd bin al-Qasim, from a man, from Khansaa', the mawlaah of Usamah bin Zayd - and she was with Naa'ilah bin al-Qaraafisah, the wife of Uthmaan: That she was in the house and Muhammad bin Abi Bakr entered and took hold of his beard and brought a spear that was with him to his (Uthmaan's) throat, so he (Uthmaan) said, "O son of my brother, by Allaah, you have taken a position that you father would not have taken" so he (Muhammad) left him and turned away ashamed and remorseful. Then some people came to him at the doorway so he repelled them for a long while until they overcame him and entered, and Muhammad left (the house) returning back...

This establishes that al-Hajuri, after slandering the name of the Companions (with his false accusation), then went on fabricate a lie against Ibn Katheer (rahimahullaah) claiming that he affirmed this matter when Ibn Katheer said nothing of the sort. It is clear that al-Hajuri affirms false and baseless things, then when he is caught out, he ascribes them spuriously to others as a means of escape from criticism. This is an example of a devious, treacherous individual.

THREE: The context in which al-Hajuri made his claim "... the participation of some of the Sahaabah in the killing of Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu)...", this was mentioned by al-Hajuri as one in a around twenty mistakes that al-Hajuri says the Companions fell into and through which he was establishing that they are not infallible from error, and he was using this to set the stage to allow his accusation against Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu) that he made a bid'ah into the deen of Islaam through sanctioning the second aadhaan for Jumu'ah. After mentioning all of these twenty or so examples, al-Hajuri said:

وكل هذه الأدلة التي أشرنا إليها لم نذكر منها شيئا غير صحيح , وهي قليل من كثير من الحالات التي حصلت للصحابة رضوان الله عليهم , وهي برهان جلي أن أفرادهم غير معصومين عن كبار الخطايا وصغارها , سواء في ذلك عثمان رضي الله عنه أو غيره

And all of these evidences which we have pointed to, we have not mentioned anything except that which is saheeh (authentic), and these are just some of many situations which occurred from the Companions (may the pleasure of Allaah be with them), and they are a clear evidence that as individuals they are not infallible from making grave mistakes or minor ones, whether that is regarding Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu) or other than him.

This clearly falsifies the claim of al-Hajuri above that he only mentioned the "apparentness" (whatever that means) "of statements" and not that he actually believes in this. This is a clear falsification and an attempt to conceal his mistake and throw it instead onto Ibn Katheer (rahimahullaah), free is Ibn Katheer from the slander of al-Hajuri. This quote also shows that al-Hajuri believed firmly that the Companions participated in the murder of Uthmaan, and that he is a calculated liar who does not feel ashamed of accusing great Scholars like Ibn Katheer of originating the foolish things that arise from himself, from Allaah is the refuge!

Now, there is more to this issue than the above and inshaa'Allaah we may take it up in another installment of this series.



Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.


More Topics
The Scholars
Politics & Current Affairs
Ittibaa' & Taqleed
The Innovators
Jihaad
Takfir
Walaa & Baraa'
Latest Articles
Takfir and the Excuse of Ignorance: Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan (5) - On Those Who Worship the Righteous Upon Ignorance
A Response to Brixton Mosque's Defence and Implementation of the Innovated Principles of al-Ma'ribi and al-Halabi
The Crimes Of 'Ustadh' Abdul-Rahman Hassan Against The Usul of Salafiyyah: Part 2
The Crimes Of 'Ustadh' Abdul-Rahman Hassan Against The Usul of Salafiyyah: Part 1
The Rulings of the Scholars Upon 'Ustadh' Abdur-Rahman Hasan Who Lied Upon the Prophet
Exonerating the Salafi Da'wah from the Jihadi Narrative of CTI Luton's Video
Takfir and the Excuse of Ignorance: Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen (2)
Tahir Wyatt, Shadeed Muhammad and the 'Nation of Islam': Part 4
Tahir Wyatt, Shadeed Muhammad and the 'Nation of Islam': Part 3
Tahir Wyatt, Shadeed Muhammad and the 'Nation of Islam': Part 2
Search This Site

 Other Websites
 Aqidah.Com - Islamic Belief
 AboveTheThrone.Com
 Asharis.Com
 Maturidis.Com
 Dajjaal.Com - The Antichrist
 Takfiris.Com

Most Popular
Shaykh Ahmad al-Subay'ee: A Beautiful Admonition to a Person of the Sunnah Against Being Fooled By the Trickery of the People Who Desert (Ahl al-Sunnah)
Al-Hasan al-Basree (d. 110H): Al-Hajjaaj bin Yusuf is the Punishment of Allaah
Tahir Wyatt, Shadeed Muhammad and the 'Nation of Islam': Part 1
Refutation of Muhammad Muneer Mufti's False Claims Regarding al-Jarh wal-Ta'deel and Warning from and Boycotting the Innovators
Taqi ud-Din an-Nabahani and Hizb ut-Tahrir: Between the Divine Methodology of Rectification and the Secular Materialistic Methodologies of Socio-Political Change Through Party Politics
The Rulings of the Scholars Upon 'Ustadh' Abdur-Rahman Hasan Who Lied Upon the Prophet
The Conference of Green Lane Mosque (Singers and Ikhwanis) and Internal Politics: Part 4 - Protecting the Historical Record From Distortion and Neglect
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzan Warns From Studying with the Likes of al-Hajuri Who Cause People to Doubt About Their Aqidah
The Administration of Green Lane Masjid, Abu Usamah Khaleefah and Lies Pertaining to Kamal al-Mekki's Magic
Ibn Abil-Izz al-Hanafi: Allaah Empowers Tyrannical, Oppressive Rulers Over the Subjects Due to Their Own Oppression and Corruption

Tags
abdul-haqq baker abdul-qadir baksh abdul-rahman hasan abdur-rahman abdul-khaaliq abdur-raoof muhammad abdur-ra'uf muhammad abu al-hasan al-ma'ribee abu usamah abu usamah khaleefah abul-hasan al-ma'ribee adnan abdul-qaadir adnan ar'oor ahmad al-subay'ee al-albaanee al-albani al-fawzaan al-fawzan al-haajooree al-halabi ali hasan al-halabi al-jabiri al-jarh wal-ta'deel al-jarh wal-ta'dil al-lajnah ad-daa'imah al-maghrib al-maghrib institute al-ma'ribi ba'thism bazmul brixton masjid brotherhood communism cti luton dammaaj egypt excuse of ignorance ghulaat ghuluww green lane mosque green lane mosque groups haajooree haddaadiyah haddaadiyyah haddadiyyah hajaawirah hajooriyyah halabiyyah hasan al-banna hizbiyyah ibn uthaimeen ibn uthaymin ibrahim al-ruhaylee innovators irjaa islamic awakening jamaa'aat jam'iyyah ihyaa al-turaath jam'iyyah ihyaa al-turah jihadi narrative kamal al-mekki luton cti madeenah.com markaz jam'iyyah ahl al-hadith marxism mhbay muwaazanah nation of islam oppression permanent committee qutbiyyah refutations ruhaylee rulership saalih al-fawzaan salafiyyah salman al-awdah sects shadeed muhammad shaykh ibn uthaymeen sinners suhaib hasan tahir wyatt takfir tamyee' taqi ud-din an-nabahani tawfique chowdhury tawhid tazkiyah tazlyah tyranny ubayd al-jaabiree uic unity what is manhaj? yahya al-hajuri yasir qadhi yemen

Archives
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010


© Manhaj.Com. All rights reserved.