Wednesday, 21 February 2024    Home  •  About Us  •  Contact Us
You are here: Home / General
The Misguided Ikhwani Shadeed Muhammad: Part 2 - Defending Aa'ishah (ra) from the Lie of Shadeed Muhammad and Protecting Her from the Poison of the Raafidah
Filed under: General
Thursday, September 07 2017 - by Admin

Bookmark and Share

Mail to a FriendPrinter friendly

Shadeed's Lie Upon Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) and the Companions (radiyallaahu anhum)

On page Page 5 of his article Shadeed reproduces the argument made by al-Awnee in which he claims that Aa'ishah, Talhah and al-Zubayr made a peaceful "Salafi protest" against Ali. Here are the words of al-Awni:

And here is Shadeed, plagiarising:

The following notes expose the lie, ignorance and desire of Shadeed, considering the fact that he knows full well the stance of the Salafi scholars regarding this topic of demonstrations (peaceful or non-peaceful) from the time of Ibn Baz and al-Albani during the 90s to the Salafi scholars of today and that they consider it a bid'ah, from the ways of the disbelievers, communists and socialists:

ONE: The historical documentation and record on this matter--as seen through the eyes of Sunni scholars, in opposition to the Raafidee Shi'ites--is that the actions of Talhah and al-Zubayr (radiyallaahu anhumaa) were not a demonstration or protest against Alee (radiyallaahu anhu). Rather, they set out on their own to Iraaq [where some of the killers were known to have fled after the assassination] to pursue justice for Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) and their action was not a protest against Alee. How is travelling to Iraaq to pursue assassins a protest against Alee [who is in the city of Madinah] in the same way that marching to the White House is a protest against the US President who is sat in it?! And as for Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa), she only set out for the purposes of islaah (rectification) between the parties and not out of protest against Alee. What Shadeed has claimed is a lie and only serves the lies of the Raafidah and their poisonous pens and words.

And this is with our knowledge that there is within the reporting in taareekh literature pertaining to the Companions and these types of events is that which is not free of the poison of the Shi'ites, because it has come through Shi'ah narrators.

TWO: In the fourth volume of Minhaj al-Sunnah (p. 316-317), Ibn Taymiyyah establishes on the basis of the reports of the historians that:

Aa'ishah did not engage in fighting and she did not leave for the purpose of fighting. Rather, she left with the intent of rectifying between the Muslims and she thought that in going out there was a benefit (maslahah) for the Muslims. Then afterwards it became clear to her that abandoning this was more befitting and whenever she would remember her going out she would cry until her khimaar was drenched with tears. Likewise, the generality of the forerunners were remorseful for what they entered into of fighting. So Talhah and Zubayr and Alee (radiyallaahu anhum ajma'een) were remorseful and none of them had any intent of fighting on the Day of Jamal. Fighting broke out without their choosing. When Alee, Talhah and Zubayr sent messages to each other (through their messengers) and they had intended agreement upon the beneficial interest, which was that when they were able, they would pursue the killers of Uthmaan, the people of tribulation...

The regret and remorse of Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu) is well reported and very clear, so how did Shadeed miss this, if we was genuinely researching the matter. The reality is that he was simply regurgitating arguments. There was no protest "in the more modern context of the word" as put by Shadeed Muhammad, rather this is a lie of Shadeed against the Companions. He means to say that the Companions went out in protest just like the protesters go out today for demanding justice, not dissimilar to the way of the Socialists, through marches and demonstrations.

THREE: The situation was that Alee was in Madeenah where the situation was delicate after the assassination of Uthmaan. Talhah and Zubayr set out to pursue the killers in Iraq on their own volition from Mecca. And Aa'ishah set out in order to rectify between the parties, to get them together so that they can pursue the killers collectively, as that would be better. She believed that her status as the Wife of the Prophet with tremendous respect would make all those concerned to come together. However, this was an erroneous ijtihaad and those Companions who pursued the killers and preceded Alee in that, they realised their error afterwards and were remorseful. And as for Alee, he was correct. The truth was with him and his ijtihaad was correct. As for Talhah and Zubayr, they desired the truth but erred in ijtihaad. And as for Aa'ishah she acted upon the Qur'an (4:114): "No good is there in much of their private conversation, except for those who enjoin charity or that which is right or conciliation between people. And whoever does that seeking means to the approval of Allah - then We are going to give him a great reward." This is made abundantly clear in the reports in the various books of taareekh.

There was no demonstration against Alee, this is a lie against those Companions. This is in fact used by the Raafidah to instigate enmity against Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) and make it appear she was in revolt against Alee (radiyallaaahu anhu). If only Shadeed had not opened this evil door, look at where jahl and hawaa and disdain of the Salafi methodology and its carriers leads you to! The Raafidah accuse Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) of fisq and kufr because she went out in revolt against Alee as they claim and here is Shadeed Muhammad attributing to her what he calls a "peaceful protest" or to use the words of John F. Kennedy whom Shadeed quoted right at the beginning of his article, a "peaceful revolution" - the outcome of which we know was violence and killing due to the action of the Saba'ite Kharijites. So the Raafidah can say that due to her "peaceful protest" (in the "modern context of the word" as Shadeed puts it), there was bloodshed and killing, and they can use this to revile the Mother of the Believers from an angle besides the one that they use (which is that she embarked on a forbidden journey and led war against Ali). Shaykh Ubayd was right against this Ikhwaani deviant, that he is "daall, mudill", a misguided strayer who misguides others, (mp3 audio).

FOUR: Imaam al-Albaani, in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah (no. 474, 1/854) explains that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) was mistaken and that there is no escape from attributing error to one of the two parties, either Alee or Talhah, Zubayr and Aa'ishah. He says that there are clear evidences that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) was in error and from them is that she herself was remorseful, and this is a sign also that her error was forgiven [because it was an ijtihaad on the basis of the verse (4:114) and she wanted to make islaah between the parties].

So how can Shadeed use this action as an argument, when those who engaged in it realised they were wrong and then showed remorse for it?

FIVE: And Ibn al-Arabi al-Maalikee in Ahkaam al-Quraan (3/369-370) defends Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) from the revilement of the Raafidah:

He explains that the Raafidah claim that on the basis of (Quran 33:32-33) Aa'ishah disobeyed Allaah by leaving the house and going on a forbidden, sinful journey by leading others into battle against Alee, as they claim. And He explains that the Scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah respond that due to the tribulations that took place, the people came to her and hoped for her blessing in bringing about islaah. So on the basis of (4:114) and (49:9) [which command islaah between believers] - with respect to what was taking place, she went out for islaah. And this is a refutation by Ahl al-Sunnah against the Raafidah, that they correctly explain that Aa'ishah went out for islaah.

And as for Shadeed Muhammad, he claims that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) went out in order to demonstrate and protest against Alee, to put pressure upon him, a viewpoint that supports the Raafidah in their lies.

As for Ahl al-Sunnah, they say that the ijtihaad is rewarded but it was a mistake and that the truth was with Alee (radiyallaahu anhu). The pursuit of the killers should have been under his command all along and not isolated and in separation, for he was agreed upon the necessity of pursuing the killers and was eager to pursue them as well, but he had more far-sighted vision and was aware of the best way to do it effectively.

In summary:

  • The Salafi scholars and the reports of the historians make it clear that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) made an ijtihaad to make islaah between the people and for this reason she left her home and as Ibn Taymiyyah explains in the same place (al-Minhaaj 4/317), this is no different to a woman going on Hajj or Umrah, which is permitted travel for a noble purpose, for she went out to make islaah and she believed that in this would be benefit for the Muslims, considering her status and the fact that she was held in honour and respect. So from the Shariah point of view this is not a forbidden journey, which is a refutation against the argument of the Raafidah.

  • The claim that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) was protesting against Alee in the same way that we find protests today among the disbelievers, and socialists and the likes, where pressure is put on the ruler or government in relation to socioeconomic injustices is a fabrication and a lie against Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) for which Shadeed needs to make immediate tawbah.

  • Likewise, the claim that Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) was protesting against Alee only aids and supports the lies and filth of the Raafidah, the enemies of Allaah and the enemies of Aa'ishah -- may Allaah curse them -- for it gives them grounds to speak ill of her. Shadeed needs to renounce this this baatil and this istidlaal bi'diyy immediately. If he does not, we will rightfully judge him with ill intent towards Aa'ishah (radiyallaahu anhaa) and her honour if he persists on this lie after its futility is clear and after the evil it necessitates is clear to Shadeed.

    Do you want to support the cause and argument of the Raafidah by supporting your bid'iyy protests which require you to fabricate lies against the Companions or do you want to be truthful about the Companions? Or is being truthful about the Companions harmful to your Ikhwani methodology?

  • The majority of the Companions did not participate in this, and those who went out with Talhah and Zubayr from the Companions were only 4 in number or 6 according to other reports. The majority of the Companions did not participate and go out, and they actually advised Talhah and Zubayr not to do so, and the truth was with them.

So why does Shadeed argue for bid'ah in the religion on the basis of erroneous ijtihaads of a very small minority of the Companions (upon whom he lies and fabricates at the same time) and abandon the consensus of the remaining majority, the senior among the Companions, and this same bid'ah he is arguing for is one that gives ammunition to the Raafidah to speak ill of the Wife of the Prophet, Aa'isha (radiyallaahu anhaa)?

The answer is that when you turn your back on the Salafi methodology and from the Salafi scholars and follow your desires, you will stumble and fumble in misguidance and misguide others, whilst thinking you are smart and enlightened. Shadeed Muhammad is "daall, mudill", a misguided strayer who misguides others, (mp3 audio).! May Allaah protect us from trials.

Link to this article:   Show: HTML LinkFull LinkShort Link
Related Articles:
Add a Comment (comments are currently moderated)
You must be registered and logged in to comment.

The Relationship Between Aqidah and Manhaj (5)
The Connection Between The Divine Law in Creation, The Condition of the Rulers and Their Subjects and the Methodologies of Rectification (6)
Search This Site

 Other Websites
 Aqidah.Com - Islamic Belief
 Dajjaal.Com - The Antichrist

Most Popular
The Rulings of the Scholars Upon 'Ustadh' Abdur-Rahman Hasan Who Lied Upon the Prophet
Documents and Resources for Countering the Doubts of the Muṣaʿfiqah
Al-Hasan al-Basree (d. 110H): Al-Hajjaaj bin Yusuf is the Punishment of Allaah
Taqi ud-Din an-Nabahani and Hizb ut-Tahrir: Between the Divine Methodology of Rectification and the Secular Materialistic Methodologies of Socio-Political Change Through Party Politics
Tahir Wyatt, Shadeed Muhammad and the 'Nation of Islam': Part 1
The Crimes Of 'Ustadh' Abdul-Rahman Hassan Against The Usul of Salafiyyah: Part 1
Refutation of Muhammad Munir Mufti's False Claims Regarding al-Jarh wal-Ta'deel and Warning from and Boycotting the Innovators
Ibn Abil-Izz al-Hanafi: Allaah Empowers Tyrannical, Oppressive Rulers Over the Subjects Due to Their Own Oppression and Corruption
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzan Warns From Studying with the Likes of al-Hajuri Who Cause People to Doubt About Their Aqidah
Takfir and the Excuse of Ignorance: Shaykh Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhaab

abdul haqq baker abdul-haqq baker abdul-qadir baksh abdul-rahman hasan abdur-rahman abdul-khaaliq abdur-raoof muhammad abdur-ra'uf muhammad abu aaliyah lamont battle abu al-hasan al-ma'ribee abu safiyyah mohammed osman abu usamah abu usamah khaleefah abul-hasan al-ma'ribee adnan abdul-qaadir adnan ar'oor ahmad al-subay'ee al-albaanee al-albani al-barbahaaree al-fawzaan al-fawzan al-haajooree al-halabi ali al-timimi ali hasan al-halabi al-jabiri al-jarh wal-ta'deel al-jarh wal-ta'dil al-lajnah ad-daa'imah al-maghrib al-maghrib institute al-ma'ribi ba'thism bazmul brixton masjid brotherhood communism cti luton dammaaj demonstrations egypt excuse of ignorance ghulaat ghuluww green lane mosque green lane mosque groups haajooree haatim al-awni haddaadiyah haddaadiyyah haddadiyyah hajaawirah hajooriyyah halabiyyah hasan al-banna hizbiyyah ibn uthaimeen ibn uthaymin ibrahim al-ruhaylee ilyas al-kanadi innovators irjaa islamic awakening jamaa'aat jam'iyyah ihyaa al-turaath jam'iyyah ihyaa al-turah jihadi narrative kamal al-mekki khalid abd al-rahman luton cti markaz jam'iyyah ahl al-hadith marxism mhbay mohammad hijab mohammed abushamma muhammad munir muwaazanah nation of islam oppression permanent committee protests qutbiyyah refutations ruhaylee rulership saalih al-fawzaan salafiyyah salman al-awdah sects shadeed muhammad shaykh ibn uthaymeen sinners suhaib hasan tahir wyatt takfir tamyee' taqi ud-din an-nabahani tawfique chowdhury tawhid tazkiyah tazlyah tyranny ubayd al-jaabiree uic unity what is manhaj? yahya al-hajuri yasir qadhi yemen

February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015

Manhaj.Com. All rights reserved.
A Beginners Guide to Arabic Grammar